Posted by
Right Viewpoint on Monday, February 05, 2007 6:55:59 AM
Pat Buchanan
wrote :
>Nick Burns, No. 3 at State, was at the Herzileah Conference this weekend. "Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon -- there's no doubt about it," Burns told the Israelis. "The policy of the U.S. government is that we cannot allow Iran to become a nuclear weapons state."
Burns was cheered and echoed by ex-Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz: "The year of 2007 is the year of decisiveness. ... The free world doesn't have the privilege to drag its feet on Iran and hope for best."
Democrats failed to stop this war. Can they stop the next one? Or do they suspect and support what they think is coming?
________________________________
Mr. Pat Buchanan was always at the Arab side of the Middle East conflict.
So, the position of ranking liberals like Barack Obama is more close to his viewpoint then the conservatives ones (like for instance the Newt Gingrich).
After all it is not a parties issue at all. And it is not even the Newt Gingrich personal disagreement with Pat Buchanan.
For example, Pat always told that the US policy at the Middle East was controlled by "Israel Lobby".
Who is the "lobby" that Mr. Buchanan is talking about?
Why Congress always votes in favor of Israel?
The so called
"Israel Lobby" is a Vast Majority of the American People:
___________________________________________
Gallup Polls on American Sympathy Toward Israel and the Arabs/Palestinians
Gallup Poll results of the most consistently asked question regarding American public attitudes toward the Middle East: "
In the Middle East situation, are your sympathies more with Israel or with the Arab nations?"
Israel|Arabsyear - %|%
1967 38 3
1967 56 4
1969 50 5
1969 44 5
1969 41 4
1970 44 3
1970 38 3
1973 38 3
1973 47 6
1973 44 5
1973 48 6
1973 48 7
1973 54 8
1973 50 7
1974 38 6
1975 44 8
1975 37 8
1977 44 8
1977 46 11
1977 37 8
1978 33 14
1978 38 11
1978 38 22
1978 44 10
1978 42 11
1978 41 12
1978 42 12
1978 41 13
1979 40 14
1979 34 11
1979 40 14
1980 45 13
1981 44 11
1981 49 12
1982 49 14
1982 51 12
1982 52 10
1982 52 10
1982 41 12
1982 32 28
1982 40 17
1983 49 12
1983 49 12
1983 49 12
1986 43 20
1988 37 15*
1988 46 24
1989 50 14
1990 48 23
1991 64 8
1991 64 7
1991 60 17
1991 59 21
1993 42 15*
1996 38 15*
1997 38 8*
1998 46 13*
1999 43 14*
2000 43 13*
2000 41 12*
2000 41 11*
2001 51 16*
2001 41 13*
2001 55 7*
2001 51 14*
2002 55 14*
2002 43 14*
2002 50 15*
2002 47 13*
2002 49 15*
2002 49 14*
2002 47 14*
2003 58 13*
2003 46 16*
2004 55 18*
2005 52 18*
_________
Middle East Sympathie. Feb. 6-9 2006. The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJby
Religious PreferenceIsrael % / Arabs %
White Protestants
63 / 14
White Catholics
64 / 13
White other religions
Israel % / Arabs %
66 / 10
White no religion
Israel % / Arabs %
45 / 19
__
by
Party Affiliation(2002-2006 Aggregate)
Israel % / Arabs %
Republicans
72 / 11
Democrats
47 / 20
Independents
49 / 16
____
by
Ideology(2002-2006 Aggregate)
Israel % / Arabs %
Conservatives
67 / 11
Liberals
43 / 25
Moderate
52 / 16
___
by
Race(2002-2006 Aggregate)
Israel % / Arabs %
Whites
58 / 14
Blacks
40 / 24
__________________________________
Top the List of Countries Seen as Our Closest Allies,
According to Harris PollHow American People Rank the US Closest Allies1. Great Britain2. Canada3. Australia4. Israel5. Japan6.Mexico
7.Italy
8.South Korea
9.Germany
10.Sweden
11.Spain
12.Holland (Netherlands)
13.Taiwan
14.India
15.Norway
16.France
17.Greece
18.Brazil
19.Russia
20.South Africa
21.Chile
22.Colombia
23.Argentina
24.Pakistan
25.China
The Harris Poll® #70, September 14, 2005
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=600
______________________________________________
So, Pat Buchanan stands at the position of small minorities of American people (mostly black & liberals) that are too far from the position of the vast majority of whites, christians, conservatives.
The only question is when Pat Buchanan will become a ranking member of the Democratic party?
___
Buchanan's Hypocrisy
"Buchanan is anti Semitic..."
____________
Pat Buchanan worked for President Nixon as a speechwriter. Both of them
shared the same negative viewpoints concerning the Jews, but ...
... Richard M. Nixon was the first President who widely open the doors of White house for the leaders of Israel government.
It was Nixon who established the closest relationship between two countires: US and Israel.
Why did Nixon so many efforts in order to set up the strong relationship between Jew's state and USA ?
Because Nixon as a President loved this country and American people more than he personally dislike Jews.
Pat Buchanan most definitely loves this country as well. The only
Buchanan 's problem is that he hates Jews more than he loves American
people.
Is a reason for him to stay at the position that more close to Arab countries than to Israel. |
Ben Shapiro wrote
March 12,
2003
Buchanan's
favorite targets are what he calls neoconservatives (read: mainstream
conservatives), who are "bent on reckless wars, global free trade and
open borders."
In the latest issue of his magazine, Buchanan also
weaves in his favorite anti-Semitic canard, that neocons are driven by
concern for the Jews and want "to conscript American blood to make the
world safe for Israel." "We believe the great conservative movement has
been hijacked and put into services that would appall the Founding
Fathers," Buchanan told the Washington Times in an interview about the
magazine. "Neocons are the useful idiots of the liberal establishment,"
Buchanan reiterated in his Dec. 30, 2002, column.
Buchanan, not the neocons, is the useful idiot of the liberal
establishment. He and others like him (notables include
Theodoracopulos) are used as straw men by the left. They make it much
easier to characterize conservatives as racist and isolationist old
white men. If conservatives wish to reach out to new constituencies,
they must jettison the Buchananites.
Buchanan's brand of "conservatism" is closer now to the far left
than it is to the mainstream right, as shown by his selection of
socialist and black nationalist Lenora Fulani for his Reform Party
running mate in the 2000 presidential election...
|
|
|
|
Ben Shapiro: "But Buchanan's favorite targets are what he calls neoconservatives (read: mainstream conservatives)..."
________
Just thought that the Rush Limbaugh's opinion can be taken in consideration as well:
"I'm
getting a little tired of these media people speaking in their own code
language. A case in point is their use of the term 'neo-conservative.'
Whether they choose to hyphenate the label or not, it's a pejorative
code word for 'Jews.'“
Anti-Semites Use "Neo-Con" Code Word, Rushlimbaugh.com, April 22, 2003
So, "Buchanan's favorite targets are" always Jews, but sometimes he uses different euphemisms or as Rush called it "Code Word".
|
| |
Hysteria at Herzliya
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
of any war.
Pat Buchanan says that Adolf Hitler only sought to dominate Europe,
making him "no physical threat to the US" ...
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Buchanan)
Mr. Buchanan called for closing the U.S. Justice Department's Office
of Special Investigations, which prosecuted Nazi war criminals ...
(New York Times, 4/21/87)
Pat Buchanan was vehement in pushing President Reagan -- despite protests
-- to visit Germany's Bitburg cemetery, where Nazi SS troops were buried...
Buchanan was credited with crafting Ronald Reagan's line that the SS troops
buried at Bitburg were "victims just as surely as the victims in the concentration
camps." (New York Times, 5/16/85; New Republic, 1/22/96)
________
The people like Pat Buchanan are always at the Nazi, Islamist, ... Evil side of any war.
They were at the Nazi side of the WW2 and now they at the Islamofascists side of the next Clash of Civilizations.
See also to whom Pat Buchanan wrote all these hatred articles, who are the people of his main target audience:
"The Enemy Within: Hot Summer of 2006":
http://conservativevalley.townhall.com/g/8cccee19-73a0-4789-8fa9-6f4852ec0f15 |
In order to justify the current position of Pat Buchanan's, he needs to justify the Nazi' position at the WW2 first.
So, he tried to explain that Mr. Hitler and his SS murders actually were not too bad guys at all.
"none" wrote pretty clear about it:
"The
main reason for the rise of Hitler was the awful Versailles Treaty ...
... only around two per cent of SS soldiers were war criminals."
That's it. The basic conclusion is always the same: "Blame the Jews!"
The
Jews were the main source of all problems for the Germany, and Mr.
Hitler was forced by circumstances to found the right solution.
Appeared that it works.
Happy End.
________
Bad news: other Jews create the same problems for the US now.
Good news: Mr. Pat Buchanan still remembers the right solution ... |